Primary and Secondary National Curriculum for Computing in ITT Expert Group
ITTE continues to support the work of the Primary and Secondary National Curriculum for Computing in ITT Expert Groups in creating an online resource to support tutors and trainees in ITT in preparing for the new curriculum. The site will continue to evolve and if you would like to contribute resources please see the contact details below.
The online resources can be accessed at https://sites.google.com/site/primaryictitt/. Please share the link freely with any interested parties.
Foreword from Bob Harrison
This site has been put together by a small group of teachers and teacher educators convened by the Department for Education and chaired by Bob Harrison. Our aim has been to curate a collection of resources for use by those training teachers to deliver the new primary and secondary computing curriculum, whether for trainees’ individual use, for use in lectures and workshops or for trainees to use as resources for their own lessons when working in school. The site will also support serving teachers as they plan their own schemes of work in line with the new curriculum.
What you see here should not be interpreted as either fixed or definitive. If there are errors or omissions, please get in touch with Miles Berry, suggesting a change or asking for editing rights so you can make the change yourself.
Useful starting points are our guidance notes, links for the Key Stage 1, Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 3 draft programmes of study, or our collection of other resource sites.
What are the issues?
1. Across the curriculum the draft Programmes of Study suggest that material which was previously taught by subject specialist teachers in key stage 3 will be delivered in primary classrooms from September 2014. In most instances this will be taught by class teachers who have developed a good understanding of primary pedagogy and classroom/resource management skills; facilitating learning through their organisation and presentation of materials and meeting the learning needs of children from 3 to 11, rather than having deep factual subject knowledge in all subjects within the curriculum. Developing subject knowledge, pedagogical knowledge and curriculum understanding in computing therefore competes within the training year with a range of other curriculum developments. However, the developments in the specification of the computing curriculum reflect much of the current practice of many primary teachers in that they emphasise the use of programmable toys, logic activities, sequencing of materials, reflecting on out-of-school experiences and presenting complex ideas in simpler forms, in particular, the visual form.
2. Teacher training in 2013/14 will need to produce trainees ready to deliver the new curriculum. Indeed NQTs and trainees on placement may be the only staff members in the school to have received any training in the new curriculum. New ITT criteria will come into effect in September 2013 such that trainees will spend at least two thirds of their time in school. Whilst training to teach the new computing curriculum, they may be working in schools with teachers not yet trained to deliver it.
3. Trainees face additional challenges in teaching computing. Whereas the typical trainee with a degree in, say geography, might have come across many of the concepts in mathematics, history, science and art a few years back in school, as pupils they are unlikely to have been taught computing and what they did do is also unlikely to have been computer science.
4. It is the calling of those training to teach in schools to develop and foster in their pupils the appropriate skills and social abilities so that the children enable their optimum, according to age, ability and aptitude. Trainee teachers assess and record progress; they prepare pupils for tests; they build on earlier learning and develop ways to encourage it further; and, they challenge and inspire pupils to help them deepen their knowledge and understanding. We are challenged with the question, “How can trainers work with trainees with such a vocation and simultaneously give them the skills, concepts and knowledge they need to enable children to make progress in computing through a broad and balanced curriculum?”
What have we done?
5. Over a series of meetings and many hours spent online in a Google group, colleagues created a smorgasbord of links based on keywords and phrases within:
- Draft ICT Programme of Study http://academy.bcs.org/content/draft-ict-programme-study
and
- Draft National Curriculum for Computing http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/nationalcurriculum2014
These are arranged by topic and are intended to meet the challenges of:
a) Developing trainees’ personal understanding, knowledge and skills of the main topics;
b) Providing material to mount group and workshop sessions; and,
c) Putting on lessons for pupils to teach key topics.
In addition the group recognised that pupils will also need to be able to evaluate sources of content, understand the difference between their private, personal and public online persona, communicate in a wide range of contexts and, most importantly, stay safe online.
Who we are.
6. The volunteers from industry, teaching and training who have met and contributed to the plethora of material were:
CHAIR:
- Bob Harrison (Toshiba Information Systems (UK) School and College Governor, CaS member)
MEMBERS:
- Phil Bagge (Member of CAS working group, AST ICT, computing teacher, Abbotswood, Calmore, Orchard Lea, Ringwood & Hiltingbury Junior Schools)
- Amanda Banks Gatenby (APE in Computer Science, University of Manchester)
- Pete Bell (Teacher of Computing, Rishworth School, Principal Examiner GCSE ICT, Pearson Education / Edexcel)
- Miles Berry (Member of Naace and CAS Boards, Senior Lecturer, University of Roehampton)
- David Brown HMI (Ofsted National Adviser for ICT)
- Helen Caldwell (VITAL SEN Portal Manager, Northampton University, ICT Advisory Teacher)
- Carol Darbyshire (Edge Hill University)
- Mark Dorling (Teacher of ICT, Digital Schoolhouse Coordinator, Langley Grammar School)
- Graham Hastings (Member of CAS working group, computing teacher, St. John’s School, Cambridge)
- Chris Leach (Head of ICT, Winchester House)
- Carrie Anne Philbin (KS3 Subject Leader, Robert Clack School, Vice Chair CAS #include)
- Louise Robinson / Emma Brown (High Force SCITT)
- Moira Savage (ITTE Committee,Teaching Fellow University of Worcester)
- Chris Shelton (Head of Primary PGCE, University of Chichester)
- Peter Twining (Professor of Education, Open University / Director of Vital)
- Jane Waite (West Hove Infants School)
- John Woollard (Member of CAS Board, Senior Teaching Fellow, University of Southampton)
- Paul Haigh (Hallam Teaching School Alliance)
- Paul Hynes (Vice Principal, George Spencer School)
- Sue Nieland (E-Skills)
- Genevieve Smith Nunes (Sussex Downs College, Outreach)
- Rachael Smith (Nottingham Trent University)
- Andy Connell (Keele University, ITTE Chair)
- Sanjesh Sharma (New Ways to Learn)
- Dan Stucke (Stretford High School)
- Drew Buddie (Royal Masonic School)
- David Weston (Teacher Development Trust)
- Margaret White (Institute of Education/ Teach First)
- Lorraine Wood (Fallibroome Academy)
- Ann Thunhurst (VITAL/ JISC / Kent University)
- Tim Eaglestone (Dorothy Stringer School)
- Dawn Hewiton (Edge Hill University)
- Joanne Devlin (Lancaster Girls’ Grammar School)
Acknowledgements
7. The group is grateful to Claire Riley and Microsoft who arranged accommodation and the Department for Education who provided support, acted as secretariat and funded T&S for the meetings. We are also grateful to ITTE for promoting the resources through their website http://www.itte.org.uk.